"Check out the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division:
First Department court orders for investigation of the former President of the New York State Bar Association Steven C. Krane by clicking on his picture for the document. This is the price of gluttony and greed and why the almighty one has deemed such a sin.
Steven Krane, Proskauer Ross LLP who is the epitome of ethics has lost his way and acted in conflict of interest and abuse of public office with both the First Department Disciplinary Committee and the New York State Bar Association in representing his partners while maintaining conflicting public office positions in the New York Supreme Courts and NYSBA.
Although his investigation has been temporarily de-railed, it will one day be completed as a formal investigation. Yet, while Krane clerked for Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals, Judith Kaye, who by the by, is married to a Proskauer partner, Stephen Kaye, who is one of the accused Proskauer Rose partners in the Intellectual Property Department (formed after learning of the Iviewit inventions), it looks like such forces are blocking the court ordered investigation through yet another series of conflicts and abuses in the investigating department.
Where it appears that Proskauer Rose LLP has positioned deep within the ethics departments and courts to block due process and stave off the inevitable.
Yet, as you read on, even these further desperate attempts to block prosecution have uncovered further conflicts which have only caused more people to become ensnared in the web of crimes and further complaints to be filed.
Where those complaints in some instances have been refused to file and docket by members of the departments acting to block complaints against themselves inapposite of the laws of those states.
Can you imagine, complaints filed against public officers where such officers than deny the complaints with out formal procedure, sounds like the old communist regime where citizens where unable to complain about their elected officials.
It does not sound like the good old USofA where we have a constitutional right to complain against our elected officials when they are found guilty of abuse of public office and as citizens we have an obligation to our country to file such charges. Yet, the onion is peeling and desperate times call for desperate measures. "
Source and Lots More
http://iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
the Above is about 1/4 the way down....
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger...
Showing posts with label Judith Kaye. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judith Kaye. Show all posts
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Foley and Larder Patent Attorney Committ Massive Fraud and is Protected by US Courts
"William J. Dick - foley and lardner - Virginia state bar rebuttal - it is interesting to note that dick in his response to the the vsb sends a portfolio patent docket that the united states patent & trademark office says has some false & misleading information contained in - such as certain patents that the company has no rights, title or interests in. the vsb refuses phone calls to re-investigate based on this information that has led to uspto and federal investigations of the matters.
in the dick exhibits you will see how iviewit got dicked around as the evidence appears that there are two sets of patents with similar names and different inventors. iviewit does not attest to these documents as factual representations of the original filings as much document tampering has occurred on the patent documents. "
Source and Lots More
http://iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
Judith Kaye - Ex. Supreme Court Judge who Protected Proskauer Rose Law Firm for Her Special Interests and her Husband WAS a partner (Stephen Kaye) - and her formoer Clerk and Co-Concpirator Steven Kaye WAS also at Proskauer Rose LLP. Well Judith Kaye USE to Work with William Dick at IBM... the Conflicts of Interest KEEP Rolling out on the Iviewt Stolen Patent.
Foley & Lardner – Doug Boehm, Steven Becker Bill Dick + Brain Utley Patent Crimes
Exhibit 1 – Case of inventor fraud perpetrated with I View It Counsel and Brian Utley
Exhibit 2 – How to claim others ideas as your own
Exhibit 7 – Case of Switching Inventors
Exhibit 9 – More on the Case of Walking Patents out of I View It and to your home
Exhibit 10 – Case of the Mismatched File Numbers on filed patent documents aka the cover-up
Exhibit 11 – Case of the changing patent titley
Exhibit 12 – Smudges & Fudges on 57013-112 and how to add your name to inventions that were invented without you
Exhibit 14 – Case of changing fonts again
Exhibit 16 – Case of bad math from an “engineer” and two certified engineers at Foley and Lardner, this is hours before filing, and the inventors have never seen these documents
Exhibit 20 – Cleaning up the mess of Utley Folly’s with Foley
Exhibit 22 – Another case of adding oneself to inventions one did not invent
Exhibit 33 – What happens to 57103/101
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Is the Corrupt Ex-Supreme Court Judith Kaye Ready to Come Clean on Covering for Proskauer Rose in the Iviewit Scandal?
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in Pacifica, California is Googling - "Iviewit Inventors" .
So is Judith Kaye Googling "Iviewit Inventors" ?
This Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Search was VERY interested in MPEG LA, in Kenneth Rubenstein - hmmmm.. Now we KNOW for FACT that Judith Kaye appointed by Mario Cuomo and lot's of Favors Owed from Andrew Cuomo .. well she Covered Up in the New York Supreme Court for her Husband's Law Firm - the Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP, as they RUINED the Lives of the "Iviewit Inventors" - So What's Up now.. Say around 11 YEARS Later..??
Corrupt Ex-Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye Now of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom played every card she had to to Cover for Proskauer Rose - for Stephen Kaye .. for Steven Krane .. for MPEG LA and well no doubt in my mind that Judith Kaye and Family made Billions on this Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent Theft over the last Decade, meanwhile the "Iviewit Inventors" - Now Being Googled by "Judith Kaye" of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom - well the lives of the "Iviewit Inventors" - has been HELL to say the Least.. they have Been Subject to Economic Terrorism.. BIGTIME.. Lives Ruined, Cars Bombed, Some Stabbed ... and THOUGH there is over 1200 documents and recordings of PROOF.. well the US Courts at EVERY Level STILL protects Those who Stole the Invention of the "Iviewit Inventors" - So What is "Judith Kaye" of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom up to? Got a Tip - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Also "Judith Kaye" of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom is interested in Posts on Raymond Joao - Why?
Links..
http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/01/mpeg-proskauer-stealing-inventions-by.html
"William Dick was Raymond Joao's replacement" - William Dick and Judith Kaye were both at IBM and their Connection is Seriously in Conflict of Interest.
www.ProskauerSucks.com
www.RaymondJoao.com
www.KennethRubenstein.com
www.iViewit.tv
www.DeniedPatent.com
So is Judith Kaye Googling "Iviewit Inventors" ?
This Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Search was VERY interested in MPEG LA, in Kenneth Rubenstein - hmmmm.. Now we KNOW for FACT that Judith Kaye appointed by Mario Cuomo and lot's of Favors Owed from Andrew Cuomo .. well she Covered Up in the New York Supreme Court for her Husband's Law Firm - the Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP, as they RUINED the Lives of the "Iviewit Inventors" - So What's Up now.. Say around 11 YEARS Later..??
Corrupt Ex-Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye Now of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom played every card she had to to Cover for Proskauer Rose - for Stephen Kaye .. for Steven Krane .. for MPEG LA and well no doubt in my mind that Judith Kaye and Family made Billions on this Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent Theft over the last Decade, meanwhile the "Iviewit Inventors" - Now Being Googled by "Judith Kaye" of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom - well the lives of the "Iviewit Inventors" - has been HELL to say the Least.. they have Been Subject to Economic Terrorism.. BIGTIME.. Lives Ruined, Cars Bombed, Some Stabbed ... and THOUGH there is over 1200 documents and recordings of PROOF.. well the US Courts at EVERY Level STILL protects Those who Stole the Invention of the "Iviewit Inventors" - So What is "Judith Kaye" of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom up to? Got a Tip - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Also "Judith Kaye" of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom is interested in Posts on Raymond Joao - Why?
Links..
http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/01/mpeg-proskauer-stealing-inventions-by.html
"William Dick was Raymond Joao's replacement" - William Dick and Judith Kaye were both at IBM and their Connection is Seriously in Conflict of Interest.
www.ProskauerSucks.com
www.RaymondJoao.com
www.KennethRubenstein.com
www.iViewit.tv
www.DeniedPatent.com
Friday, March 19, 2010
"Will Judith Kaye Use Her Jimmy Choo Shoes to Run to the Nearest OAG Exit?" - Judith Kaye - Andrew Cuomo, Conflict of Interst. Cuomo Family Secrets.
"" Once upon a time, a prince named Andrew who would be king, prevailed upon his fairy godmother named Judith to wave her magic wand and make his problems miraculously disappear. . .
Ms. Kaye,
Since you now have an email address at the OAG, presumably with office space, staff, and expenses paid with tax dollars (courtesy of Andrew Cuomo), I will be resending the three emails I previously sent you at your private law office on 3/12/10 to your OAG email address.
As to your own lack of monetary compensation, the financial arrangement you made with Andrew Cuomo to work pro bono appears to be a generous offer to an uninformed public and a sleeping and non-inquisitive NY press.
I am not in either category. Therefore, I am insisting that you accept $1.00 from NYS funds--not a penny more or less--in payment for your services as independent counsel to the OAG. Informed individuals and lawyers know the legal significance of either offering or accepting state funds--even $1.00--in a situation rife with the possibility of potential criminal charges later being sought.
I would also request that you go on public record that you have accepted $1.00 as salary to serve as independent counsel. Andrew Cuomo's refusal to offer $1.00 from state funds and your refusal to accept $1.00 from state funds could be very telling re: what you knew before agreeing to be independent counsel and what Andrew Cuomo expects from you as independent counsel.
My instincts are hardly ever wrong.
Andrew Cuomo has already gone on public record claiming that his appointment of you as independent counsel was to insure the public of the integrity of the investigation. I believe otherwise--that he had an ulterior and improper motive for appointing you.
Andrew Cuomo is first and foremost a politician and politicians are infamous for granting favors now and collecting payment later. Andrew Cuomo's appointment of you can reasonably and legitimately be viewed as his collecting a delayed payment that was still owed to his father by you..
Governor Paterson has known for some time about the Cuomo family's dirty little secrets. He may be legally blind, but he's not dumb. Rest assured, he knew exactly what he was doing when he asked Andrew Cuomo to investigate any charges against him.
I would venture that he's not laying awake at night worrying whether there will be any criminal charges brought against him.
As to your own predicament and for your own consideration, I acknowledge that claims of appearance of impropriety/conflict of interest do not arise simply out of mere friendship. However, your relationship with the Cuomo family goes well beyond that standard, as even you should be willing to admit. To be blunt, your professional standing and social status is undeniably associated with Mario Cuomo.
Who would Andrew Cuomo be if his father wasn't Mario Cuomo?
Like most attorneys, he would most likely be toiling away in relative obscurity at some non-prestigious law firm or employed by some government agency in an equally obscure position--similar to the career path you possibly would have suffered except for the same Mario Cuomo.
Please don't take this last comment as a personal insult--it's just a recognition of reality, even for myself. There is always someone more intelligent, more capable, more insightful, more principled, more connected, etc. when it comes to filling any position.
Given the Cuomo family dirty little secrets, doesn't it seem strange to you that Andrew Cuomo would ask you to be independent counsel when there are thousands of NY lawyers with prosecutorial experience who have no indebtedness to the Cuomo family or connection to any of NY's hidden political scandals?
Doesn't instinctively knowing that Andrew Cuomo will very possibly expect you to remain silent about crimes and misconduct not connected to David Paterson but linked to the OAG and the NYSP cause you any angst?
Wouldn't any deliberate decision to look the other way be in violation of certain provisions of the Lawyer's Code of Professional Conduct? As a former chief judge for NYS who has written books on ethics, you very likely know this code forward and backward.
Additionally and perhaps irrelevant, you most likely are aware of Christine Anderson's lawsuit claiming that the disciplinary committee for the 1st department of the NY OCA whitewashed and covered up charges made against politically connected attorneys. If you recall, this suit was filed during the last years of your service as chief judge.
Furthermore, any future claim by you that you were only appointed to investigate the Booker matter and World Series tickets matter and, therefore, can ignore any damaging information re: your main benefactor, his son, and others would be subject to justifiable ridicule.
I would hope that you, as a former NYS chief judge, would hold yourself to the highest ethical standards possible and won't resort to "lawyer speak" in defense of your actions if ever questioned.
Andrew Cuomo, and not me, has placed you in a compromising position that should mandate your own withdrawal as independent counsel.
It would be naive to believe that attorneys representing various targets of your investigation who have already been sent the three emails you were sent would not want concessions for their clients or input into any of your findings in return for their own silence.
The fact that each side knows of the Cuomo family's dirty little secrets need not be verbalized, knowledge alone being sufficient enough to cast doubt on the credibility and integrity of any investigation.and its findings.
It would seem to me that there is only one available option if you wish to continue as independent counsel, i,e., to make a full and public disclosure of the compromising position Andrew Cuomo has chosen to put you in--something, I doubt, you would be willing to do.
In the event that you are not a true liberal like myself who can stand on principle, this insignificant nobody and ordinary US citizen would offer this advice: Use your Jimmy Choo high heels and presumed arthritic knees to run as fast as possible to the nearest OAG exit. Prince Andrew, who would be king, is not worthy enough for you to risk the potential damage to your own public reputation. ""
Source
Sent in by A Reader
Ms. Kaye,
Since you now have an email address at the OAG, presumably with office space, staff, and expenses paid with tax dollars (courtesy of Andrew Cuomo), I will be resending the three emails I previously sent you at your private law office on 3/12/10 to your OAG email address.
As to your own lack of monetary compensation, the financial arrangement you made with Andrew Cuomo to work pro bono appears to be a generous offer to an uninformed public and a sleeping and non-inquisitive NY press.
I am not in either category. Therefore, I am insisting that you accept $1.00 from NYS funds--not a penny more or less--in payment for your services as independent counsel to the OAG. Informed individuals and lawyers know the legal significance of either offering or accepting state funds--even $1.00--in a situation rife with the possibility of potential criminal charges later being sought.
I would also request that you go on public record that you have accepted $1.00 as salary to serve as independent counsel. Andrew Cuomo's refusal to offer $1.00 from state funds and your refusal to accept $1.00 from state funds could be very telling re: what you knew before agreeing to be independent counsel and what Andrew Cuomo expects from you as independent counsel.
My instincts are hardly ever wrong.
Andrew Cuomo has already gone on public record claiming that his appointment of you as independent counsel was to insure the public of the integrity of the investigation. I believe otherwise--that he had an ulterior and improper motive for appointing you.
Andrew Cuomo is first and foremost a politician and politicians are infamous for granting favors now and collecting payment later. Andrew Cuomo's appointment of you can reasonably and legitimately be viewed as his collecting a delayed payment that was still owed to his father by you..
Governor Paterson has known for some time about the Cuomo family's dirty little secrets. He may be legally blind, but he's not dumb. Rest assured, he knew exactly what he was doing when he asked Andrew Cuomo to investigate any charges against him.
I would venture that he's not laying awake at night worrying whether there will be any criminal charges brought against him.
As to your own predicament and for your own consideration, I acknowledge that claims of appearance of impropriety/conflict of interest do not arise simply out of mere friendship. However, your relationship with the Cuomo family goes well beyond that standard, as even you should be willing to admit. To be blunt, your professional standing and social status is undeniably associated with Mario Cuomo.
Who would Andrew Cuomo be if his father wasn't Mario Cuomo?
Like most attorneys, he would most likely be toiling away in relative obscurity at some non-prestigious law firm or employed by some government agency in an equally obscure position--similar to the career path you possibly would have suffered except for the same Mario Cuomo.
Please don't take this last comment as a personal insult--it's just a recognition of reality, even for myself. There is always someone more intelligent, more capable, more insightful, more principled, more connected, etc. when it comes to filling any position.
Given the Cuomo family dirty little secrets, doesn't it seem strange to you that Andrew Cuomo would ask you to be independent counsel when there are thousands of NY lawyers with prosecutorial experience who have no indebtedness to the Cuomo family or connection to any of NY's hidden political scandals?
Doesn't instinctively knowing that Andrew Cuomo will very possibly expect you to remain silent about crimes and misconduct not connected to David Paterson but linked to the OAG and the NYSP cause you any angst?
Wouldn't any deliberate decision to look the other way be in violation of certain provisions of the Lawyer's Code of Professional Conduct? As a former chief judge for NYS who has written books on ethics, you very likely know this code forward and backward.
Additionally and perhaps irrelevant, you most likely are aware of Christine Anderson's lawsuit claiming that the disciplinary committee for the 1st department of the NY OCA whitewashed and covered up charges made against politically connected attorneys. If you recall, this suit was filed during the last years of your service as chief judge.
Furthermore, any future claim by you that you were only appointed to investigate the Booker matter and World Series tickets matter and, therefore, can ignore any damaging information re: your main benefactor, his son, and others would be subject to justifiable ridicule.
I would hope that you, as a former NYS chief judge, would hold yourself to the highest ethical standards possible and won't resort to "lawyer speak" in defense of your actions if ever questioned.
Andrew Cuomo, and not me, has placed you in a compromising position that should mandate your own withdrawal as independent counsel.
It would be naive to believe that attorneys representing various targets of your investigation who have already been sent the three emails you were sent would not want concessions for their clients or input into any of your findings in return for their own silence.
The fact that each side knows of the Cuomo family's dirty little secrets need not be verbalized, knowledge alone being sufficient enough to cast doubt on the credibility and integrity of any investigation.and its findings.
It would seem to me that there is only one available option if you wish to continue as independent counsel, i,e., to make a full and public disclosure of the compromising position Andrew Cuomo has chosen to put you in--something, I doubt, you would be willing to do.
In the event that you are not a true liberal like myself who can stand on principle, this insignificant nobody and ordinary US citizen would offer this advice: Use your Jimmy Choo high heels and presumed arthritic knees to run as fast as possible to the nearest OAG exit. Prince Andrew, who would be king, is not worthy enough for you to risk the potential damage to your own public reputation. ""
Source
Sent in by A Reader
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)