Proskauer Rose Guilty, Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court
Showing posts with label New York Corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Corruption. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Proskauer Rose LLP, Proskauer Law Firm, Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud.. IViewit is Next. 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal, USPTO, DOJ, SEC, knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud.
"Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.
Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1
—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—
—-
United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
—-
Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant
–v–
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)
LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:
(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)
Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.
ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv
Table of Contents
Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6
Motion to.. 22
I. Introduction.. 23
a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23
b. Meet the coupsters.. 26
c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39
d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48
II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69
III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83
IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92
HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96
V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96
VI. DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97
VII. Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97
VIII. Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98
IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98
X. Relief.. 99
Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100
Exhibit 2. 106
EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108
Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108
MOTION TO:
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.
· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.
FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.
· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.
· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.
· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.
· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.
——
Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.
—–
I. Introduction
“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm
A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.
THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.
—
[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365
[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani
http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/
—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.
These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.
They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.
Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.
Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.
Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.
Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?
The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.
Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.
Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.
Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.
These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.
We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.
We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”
PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.
A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.
Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1
—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—
IVIEWIT DRAFT MOTION TO SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS OF CONFLICTS
Case No. 08-4873-CV—-
United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
—-
Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant
–v–
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)
LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:
(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)
Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.
ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv
Table of Contents
Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6
Motion to.. 22
I. Introduction.. 23
a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23
b. Meet the coupsters.. 26
c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39
d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48
II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69
III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83
IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92
HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96
V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96
VI. DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97
VII. Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97
VIII. Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98
IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98
X. Relief.. 99
Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100
Exhibit 2. 106
EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108
Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108
MOTION TO:
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.
· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.
FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.
· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.
· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.
· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.
· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.
——
Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.
—–
I. Introduction
“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm
A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.
THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.
—
[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365
[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani
http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/
—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.
These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.
They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.
Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.
Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.
Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.
Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?
The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.
Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.
Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.
Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.
These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.
We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.
We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”
PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.
A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."
Source and Full Article
More on the iViewit Story
Friday, February 17, 2012
David Carr of the New York Times pretending to do investigative reporting, yet David Carr LIES, turns victims into criminals. And my Guess is the Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg story is not Different. David Carr is a PROVEN Liar, and has No accountability for his LIES.
This is Ridiculous, you Shouldn't Lie to David Carr, what a Crock of Shit that Is.
David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.
I will Soon Sue David Carr for Defamation and So Should Greg Osberg. As David Carr spoke to me, and knew the other side to the story, and though I already was served up a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and plenty of hate, David Carr of the New York Times served me up some more by deliberately defaming me, all to protect corporate greed and the abuse of government programs at the taxpayers expense. Why trash an investigative blogger doing what he does, talking to sources and posting a story?
I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.
Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.
Here is the Article:
"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"
"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.
New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”
Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.
Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.
Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”
"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”
Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.
“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”
Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:
I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.
What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.
Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.
“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”
“I was angry.”
Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/
David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?
I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courts. David Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news. I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.
David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.
David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts. David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.
"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?
The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof. David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.
*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"
Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof. David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.
Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.
David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.
Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.
See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.
DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.
David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.
David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.
David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.
I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one. Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.
Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.
See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say. David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.
I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.
Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.
David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.
Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.
David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story. I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.
Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.
Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.
David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.
Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...
Do your Homework.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.douglaschey.com/
David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.
Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.
David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.
 |
| David Carr is the Pencil Neck on the Left |
I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.
Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.
Here is the Article:
"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"
"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.
New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
 |
| David Carr, New York Times |
By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”
Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.
Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.
Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”
"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”
Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.
“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”
Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:
I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.
What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.
Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.
“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”
“I was angry.”
Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/
David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?
I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courts. David Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news. I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.
David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.
David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts. David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.
"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?
The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof. David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.
*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"
Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof. David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.
Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.
David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.
Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.
See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.
DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.
David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.
David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.
David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.
I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one. Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.
Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.
See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say. David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.
I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.
Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.
David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.
Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.
David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story. I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.
Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.
Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.
David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.
Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...
Do your Homework.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.douglaschey.com/
David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.
Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.
David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
Do your Homework, Think For Yourself, Believe NO One.
READ, Study, find the TRUTH for yourself.
NEVER listen to David Carr of the New York Times.
NEVER listen to David Carr of the New York Times.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Proskauer Rose lies to the courts over their Involvement in Stealing a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent. Proskauer Rose Fraud, Corruption and Cover Ups.
May 2004 - Proskauer Rose Corruption Letter to Thomas Cahill from iViewit
"Thomas J. Cahill
Chief Counsel
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10006
Re: Complaint of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., Against Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq., Docket
2003.0531: Demand to Strike Response
Dear Mr. Cahill:
By way of introduction, I am Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, “Company”) with a background of which the Company invites you to
view at http://www.iviewit.com/management.htm and I write to demand the striking of the
response of Kenneth Rubenstein (“Respondent”) to the Company’s New York State Bar
Association Complaint of February 26, 2003 (“Complaint”).
Moreover, upon information belief, the response of Respondent was authored by Steven C. Krane
a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP, then the direct past President of the New York State Bar
Association (“NYSBA”) whom held a myriad of positions of influence at the NYSBA at the time
he authored the response for Respondent, also a partner of Proskauer Rose LLP.
The conflict of interest is inherent that while maintaining such positions of influence at the NYSBA, Mr. Krane was also a partner of the same law firm as Respondent, Proskauer Rose LLP, and it is astounding
that the NYSBA would allow one with such a highly conflicted position to even be part of the
response process of the Respondent, let alone sign a document authored in his defense. In fact,
the Complaint against the Respondent transcends his singular role as an attorney in the matter and
in all other state and federal complaints is directed at the entire firm of Proskauer Rose LLP.
This so taints both the entire review of this matter in addition to tainting the NYSBA that we demand a
review of this matter by an unbiased party with authority over the discipline of New York
attorneys and discipline over the NYSBA.
Presently, Mr. Krane holds the following positions, whereby the matter against Respondent must elevate beyond any association with any organization where Mr. Krane has any form of influence that could further prejudice this matter in favor of his partner, Kenneth Rubenstein and their law firm Proskauer Rose LLP:
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, HOUSE OF DELEGATES,
1996 - PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, VICE-CHAIR, COMMITTEE ON THE
FUTURE OF THE PROFESSION, 1997 – PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, CHAIR, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO
REVIEW THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 1995 – PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO
REVIEW THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 1992-1995
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, 1990-1994
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, CHAIR, TASK FORCE ON
SIMPLIFICATION OF LAW, 1989-1991; MEMBER 1988-1989, 1991-1992
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON COURTS
OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION, 1984-1988
FINALLY, AT THE TIME OF HIS RESPONSE FOR RESPONDENT, KRANE WAS
THE IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR
Accordingly, by the authorship of the response of Respondent, said response cannot be viewed in
an unbiased manner, and is so highly conflicted, that it constitutes no response at all in the
defense of Respondent and should be stricken in his defense according to the demand stated
herein.
Furthermore, once stricken, Respondent has made no response at all in his defense,
whereby the Company demands the immediate investigation of its specific, factual allegations
against Respondent and Mr. Krane by an unbiased third party with a view towards administering
discipline, whether by admonishment, reprimand, suspension, resignation, or disbarment, but
preferably move this matter to the next higher level of review where Mr. Krane has no
membership or appointed position.
Let this letter serve additionally as a formal complaint against Mr. Krane with NYSBA and any
oversight department for the NYSBA. We charge that Mr. Krane has a multiplicity of conflicts of
interests in his highly unethical and self-serving behavior of using his position of influence at the
NYSBA designed to protect consumer interests against unethical attorneys, to attempt to malign
justice in favor of an attorney who is his partner and his law firm Proskauer Rose LLP and
exculpate them from such charges. If you need any further form of formal complaint filed against
Mr. Krane, please notify us immediately.
We also ask for a formal retraction and redaction from Mr. Krane of every statement made by
him in defense of the Respondent, so that we may circulate such retraction and redaction to every
state and federal agency currently reviewing the matter against Respondent and the entire law
firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, whom have also been tainted by such maligned statements.
Since the Respondent’s response defense has been used as defense in the following investigations and
court cases a retraction/redaction is necessary in order that the Company may notify such
authorities of the biases inherent in the defense for:
Complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler with The Florida State Bar
Complaint against William J. Dick with the Virginia State Bar
Complaint against Raymond Joao with the NYSBA
Proskauer Rose LLP v. Iviewit in the 15th
Civil Circuit Court of West Palm Beach, FL.
Furthermore, although distinct complaints have been filed against Raymond Joao who is not a
Proskauer Rose LLP attorney, yet upon information and belief we have been told by the NYSBA
that the two complaints have been merged we demand an immediate uncoupling so that the Joao
complaint does not suffer the bias inherent in the Respondent’s Complaint.
We ask similarly that the same actions as directed herein for Respondent’s Complaint be administered to Joao’s complaint.
Finally, Mr. Krane in his defense on behalf of Respondent attempts an unfounded attack on the
statements made by the inventor Eliot Bernstein whom all such personal affronts seem worthless
in view of recent complaints filed against Proskauer Rose LLP and Respondent to the
Commissioner of Patent & Trademarks for the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby
claims of FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE by
Respondent and the entire firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, including MR. Krane, were co-signed by
the Company’s largest investor, Stephen J. Warner, Chairman & Co-Founder of Crossbow
Ventures, Inc the largest and most prominent venture fund in South Florida.
Biography of Steven Krane from the Proskauer Rose LLP website
Biography of Kenneth Rubenstein from the Proskauer Rose LLP website
Response of Steven Krane on behalf of Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP to
the NY Bar
Rebuttal of Iviewit (without exhibits) to response of Steven Krane on behalf of the
Iviewit shareholders..."
Source of Proskauer Rose Corruption Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2005%2019%20KRANE%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20STRIKE%20KRANE%20RESPONSE%20RUBENSTE.pdf
posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
"Thomas J. Cahill
Chief Counsel
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10006
Re: Complaint of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., Against Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq., Docket
2003.0531: Demand to Strike Response
Dear Mr. Cahill:
By way of introduction, I am Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, “Company”) with a background of which the Company invites you to
view at http://www.iviewit.com/management.htm and I write to demand the striking of the
response of Kenneth Rubenstein (“Respondent”) to the Company’s New York State Bar
Association Complaint of February 26, 2003 (“Complaint”).
Moreover, upon information belief, the response of Respondent was authored by Steven C. Krane
a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP, then the direct past President of the New York State Bar
Association (“NYSBA”) whom held a myriad of positions of influence at the NYSBA at the time
he authored the response for Respondent, also a partner of Proskauer Rose LLP.
The conflict of interest is inherent that while maintaining such positions of influence at the NYSBA, Mr. Krane was also a partner of the same law firm as Respondent, Proskauer Rose LLP, and it is astounding
that the NYSBA would allow one with such a highly conflicted position to even be part of the
response process of the Respondent, let alone sign a document authored in his defense. In fact,
the Complaint against the Respondent transcends his singular role as an attorney in the matter and
in all other state and federal complaints is directed at the entire firm of Proskauer Rose LLP.
This so taints both the entire review of this matter in addition to tainting the NYSBA that we demand a
review of this matter by an unbiased party with authority over the discipline of New York
attorneys and discipline over the NYSBA.
Presently, Mr. Krane holds the following positions, whereby the matter against Respondent must elevate beyond any association with any organization where Mr. Krane has any form of influence that could further prejudice this matter in favor of his partner, Kenneth Rubenstein and their law firm Proskauer Rose LLP:
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, HOUSE OF DELEGATES,
1996 - PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, VICE-CHAIR, COMMITTEE ON THE
FUTURE OF THE PROFESSION, 1997 – PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, CHAIR, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO
REVIEW THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 1995 – PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO
REVIEW THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 1992-1995
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, 1990-1994
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, CHAIR, TASK FORCE ON
SIMPLIFICATION OF LAW, 1989-1991; MEMBER 1988-1989, 1991-1992
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON COURTS
OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION, 1984-1988
FINALLY, AT THE TIME OF HIS RESPONSE FOR RESPONDENT, KRANE WAS
THE IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR
Accordingly, by the authorship of the response of Respondent, said response cannot be viewed in
an unbiased manner, and is so highly conflicted, that it constitutes no response at all in the
defense of Respondent and should be stricken in his defense according to the demand stated
herein.
Furthermore, once stricken, Respondent has made no response at all in his defense,
whereby the Company demands the immediate investigation of its specific, factual allegations
against Respondent and Mr. Krane by an unbiased third party with a view towards administering
discipline, whether by admonishment, reprimand, suspension, resignation, or disbarment, but
preferably move this matter to the next higher level of review where Mr. Krane has no
membership or appointed position.
Let this letter serve additionally as a formal complaint against Mr. Krane with NYSBA and any
oversight department for the NYSBA. We charge that Mr. Krane has a multiplicity of conflicts of
interests in his highly unethical and self-serving behavior of using his position of influence at the
NYSBA designed to protect consumer interests against unethical attorneys, to attempt to malign
justice in favor of an attorney who is his partner and his law firm Proskauer Rose LLP and
exculpate them from such charges. If you need any further form of formal complaint filed against
Mr. Krane, please notify us immediately.
We also ask for a formal retraction and redaction from Mr. Krane of every statement made by
him in defense of the Respondent, so that we may circulate such retraction and redaction to every
state and federal agency currently reviewing the matter against Respondent and the entire law
firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, whom have also been tainted by such maligned statements.
Since the Respondent’s response defense has been used as defense in the following investigations and
court cases a retraction/redaction is necessary in order that the Company may notify such
authorities of the biases inherent in the defense for:
Complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler with The Florida State Bar
Complaint against William J. Dick with the Virginia State Bar
Complaint against Raymond Joao with the NYSBA
Proskauer Rose LLP v. Iviewit in the 15th
Civil Circuit Court of West Palm Beach, FL.
Furthermore, although distinct complaints have been filed against Raymond Joao who is not a
Proskauer Rose LLP attorney, yet upon information and belief we have been told by the NYSBA
that the two complaints have been merged we demand an immediate uncoupling so that the Joao
complaint does not suffer the bias inherent in the Respondent’s Complaint.
We ask similarly that the same actions as directed herein for Respondent’s Complaint be administered to Joao’s complaint.
Finally, Mr. Krane in his defense on behalf of Respondent attempts an unfounded attack on the
statements made by the inventor Eliot Bernstein whom all such personal affronts seem worthless
in view of recent complaints filed against Proskauer Rose LLP and Respondent to the
Commissioner of Patent & Trademarks for the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby
claims of FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE by
Respondent and the entire firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, including MR. Krane, were co-signed by
the Company’s largest investor, Stephen J. Warner, Chairman & Co-Founder of Crossbow
Ventures, Inc the largest and most prominent venture fund in South Florida.
Attached to this communication are the following items:
Biography of Steven Krane from the Proskauer Rose LLP website
Biography of Kenneth Rubenstein from the Proskauer Rose LLP website
Response of Steven Krane on behalf of Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP to
the NY Bar
Rebuttal of Iviewit (without exhibits) to response of Steven Krane on behalf of the
Iviewit shareholders..."
Source of Proskauer Rose Corruption Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2005%2019%20KRANE%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20STRIKE%20KRANE%20RESPONSE%20RUBENSTE.pdf
posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
New York Supreme Court Whistleblower. Corruption in New Your Courts - Enough is Enough.
" Christine Anderson NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Swinging @ New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. Claims Cuomo Violating Public Office & Aiding Abetting Criminal Obstruction of Justice! Iviewit Technologies
Christine C. Anderson Moves to Disqualify NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo! UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Case No.: 07cv9599 Fed JudgeShira A. Scheindlin Legally "related" to Iviewit Suit.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America (Free-Press-Release.com) September 17, 2010 -- Christine C. Anderson, New York Supreme Court Wistleblower Comes Out Swinging at New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, claims Cuomo Violating Public Office Duties Aiding Abetting Criminal Obstruction of Justice?
Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein Supports Anderson’s Heroic Claims of Corruption in the New York Supreme Courts and Prosecutors Offices. READ ALL ABOUT IT @ Expose Corrupt Courts!!!@
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=391
Excerpts from Anderson's Motion in Fed Court and Keep in Mind Anderson worked in the NY Supreme Court Ethics Department so her opinion on law and ethics is steeped in experience.
"I, Christine C. Anderson, make the following affirmation under penalties of perjury: I, Christine C. Anderson, am the plaintiff-appellant in the above entitled action, and respectfully move this court to issue an order disqualifying the Office of the New York State Attorney General from representing defendant-employees of the State of New York in any legal proceeding involving the herein before any federal or state court, agency or any other tribunal."..."
Thus, while the plaintiff charged the defendants with serious violations of law, the Attorney General stood before the jury defending these very same actions as proper and within the law. This arrangement seriously prejudiced the plaintiff, as jurors could and likely did conclude that the State of New York supported fully the conduct of the defendants.
Ongoing Conflict of Interest
5. Representation by the New York Attorney General’s office in the pending appeal continues the improper prejudice against plaintiff. Furthermore, not only did the Attorney General’s representation of the defendants unduly prejudice the plaintiff, but it also raised serious conflict of interest issues with respect to the defendants themselves.
To protect their own rights, each of the defendants had to have their own attorneys in order to permit them to cross claim or make admissions, including their own right to protect their own individual rights in this appeal.
Under New York State and federal conflict of interest rules, each of the defendants must be free to undertake these independent actions.
To do so, they must have their own counsel. (See NYS Code of Professional Conduct Cannon 5 Conflict of Interest Rules.[1]) The Attorney General as a state attorney is bound by these rules as well.
6. This constitutes New York State law, and the attorney who violates these safeguards must be immediately removed from the case.”
“Without question, the Attorney General violated its ethical rules and the public trust in undertaking to represent all of the defendants.
The Attorney General continues to violate its ethical rules by appearing before this appellate body.
This would be the case, even were it established that the defendants had sought to consent to such representation.”
“The conflict here is particularly acute given the nature of the claims brought by plaintiff Anderson. Plaintiff’s charges warranted an independent investigation by the New York State Attorney General’s Office to review the basic claims given that Anderson was formerly a Departmental Disciplinary Committee staff attorney with considerable experience and over the years received excellent evaluations.
The fact is that these are not allegations from a lay person.
10. While at the DDC, Plaintiff Anderson was charged with investigating cases involving possible criminal and civil misconduct by attorneys.
She carried out her duties as a duly authorized officer of the Court. The New York State Attorney General’s Office was therefore obligated to protect her and to investigate her claims of serious misconduct against the named parties. To the Contrary, the New York State Attorney General’s Office failed to do so.
11. The Attorney General is a publicly funded arm of the State. It was conflicted from the outset of this case because it could not possibly defend any of the defendants, while simultaneously investigating plaintiff’s claims of serious ongoing misconduct by the defendants.
Indeed, no explanation has ever been provided as to why the Attorney General did not represent plaintiff Anderson against any of the original defendants. This was itself a misappropriation of public funds by a state investigative agency with prosecution powers.”
“36. The court gave the jury above-referenced instructions and its members adjourned to the jury room to deliberate at approximately 1:25 pm on Thursday, October 29, 2009.
After the jury left the courtroom, the court first announced that she had denied the defendants’ pending motion for a directed verdict.
She next stated words to the effect that she found that , “….Cahill was aware of the whitewashing allegations…” (Exhibit A, pages 808-809) The judge read this statement related to defendant Cahill’s conduct into the record as part of her order denying defendant’s directed verdict.
This fact alone requires a new trial, and should have resulted in the Attorney General’s office immediately withdrawing from the case.”
38. The Court’s finding of culpability on the part of Defendant Cahill constitutes newly discovered evidence, which directly supports the fundamental allegations of Plaintiff.
Remand to the District Court for a new trial is highly likely as the trial court abused its discretion in denying a new trial. The Attorney General’s failure to withdraw is, in fact, sanctionable and worthy of referral to the attorney ethics committee.”
V. Witness Tampering – Threat on Witness in a Federal Proceeding
42. The Attorney General and the trial court were aware that in August of 2008, one of the plaintiff’s witnesses, DDC staff attorney Nicole Corrado, was threatened.
Two days prior to her deposition testimony, state employee, and DDC Deputy Chief Counsel, Andral N. Bratton, and who had been her immediate supervisor for approximately 5 years, confronted Corrado.”
“43. Following Corrado’s deposition testimony on August 21, 2008, Bratton’s behavior toward Corrado became more harassing, troubling, frightening and threatening as he began to follow her inside and outside of the state office where they both worked. Corrado subsequently reported these serious issues to DDC chief counsel Allan Friedberg, Deputy chief Counsel Sherry Cohen, a defendant in the current proceeding, and DDC Chief Investigator Vincent Raniere- all of whom who took no required action.”
Other Iviewit News
"Another One Bites the Dust! Defendant in Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Federal Lawsuit, Sherry K. Cohen of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee joins Thomas Cahill in early retirement.
Iviewit Inventor, Eliot I Bernstein Supports Criminal Actions Against Cohen, Cahill and other Members of the New York Supreme Court. EXTRA — READ ALL ABOUT IT @ EXPOSE CORRUPT COURTS!!!" @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=394
Source of Post
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-christine-anderson-ny-supreme-court-whistleblower-swinging-new-york-attorney-general-andrew-cuomo-claims-cuomo-violating-public-office-aiding-ab-1284724204.html
Christine C. Anderson Moves to Disqualify NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo! UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Case No.: 07cv9599 Fed JudgeShira A. Scheindlin Legally "related" to Iviewit Suit.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America (Free-Press-Release.com) September 17, 2010 -- Christine C. Anderson, New York Supreme Court Wistleblower Comes Out Swinging at New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, claims Cuomo Violating Public Office Duties Aiding Abetting Criminal Obstruction of Justice?
Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein Supports Anderson’s Heroic Claims of Corruption in the New York Supreme Courts and Prosecutors Offices. READ ALL ABOUT IT @ Expose Corrupt Courts!!!@
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=391
Excerpts from Anderson's Motion in Fed Court and Keep in Mind Anderson worked in the NY Supreme Court Ethics Department so her opinion on law and ethics is steeped in experience.
"I, Christine C. Anderson, make the following affirmation under penalties of perjury: I, Christine C. Anderson, am the plaintiff-appellant in the above entitled action, and respectfully move this court to issue an order disqualifying the Office of the New York State Attorney General from representing defendant-employees of the State of New York in any legal proceeding involving the herein before any federal or state court, agency or any other tribunal."..."
Thus, while the plaintiff charged the defendants with serious violations of law, the Attorney General stood before the jury defending these very same actions as proper and within the law. This arrangement seriously prejudiced the plaintiff, as jurors could and likely did conclude that the State of New York supported fully the conduct of the defendants.
Ongoing Conflict of Interest
5. Representation by the New York Attorney General’s office in the pending appeal continues the improper prejudice against plaintiff. Furthermore, not only did the Attorney General’s representation of the defendants unduly prejudice the plaintiff, but it also raised serious conflict of interest issues with respect to the defendants themselves.
To protect their own rights, each of the defendants had to have their own attorneys in order to permit them to cross claim or make admissions, including their own right to protect their own individual rights in this appeal.
Under New York State and federal conflict of interest rules, each of the defendants must be free to undertake these independent actions.
To do so, they must have their own counsel. (See NYS Code of Professional Conduct Cannon 5 Conflict of Interest Rules.[1]) The Attorney General as a state attorney is bound by these rules as well.
6. This constitutes New York State law, and the attorney who violates these safeguards must be immediately removed from the case.”
“Without question, the Attorney General violated its ethical rules and the public trust in undertaking to represent all of the defendants.
The Attorney General continues to violate its ethical rules by appearing before this appellate body.
This would be the case, even were it established that the defendants had sought to consent to such representation.”
“The conflict here is particularly acute given the nature of the claims brought by plaintiff Anderson. Plaintiff’s charges warranted an independent investigation by the New York State Attorney General’s Office to review the basic claims given that Anderson was formerly a Departmental Disciplinary Committee staff attorney with considerable experience and over the years received excellent evaluations.
The fact is that these are not allegations from a lay person.
10. While at the DDC, Plaintiff Anderson was charged with investigating cases involving possible criminal and civil misconduct by attorneys.
She carried out her duties as a duly authorized officer of the Court. The New York State Attorney General’s Office was therefore obligated to protect her and to investigate her claims of serious misconduct against the named parties. To the Contrary, the New York State Attorney General’s Office failed to do so.
11. The Attorney General is a publicly funded arm of the State. It was conflicted from the outset of this case because it could not possibly defend any of the defendants, while simultaneously investigating plaintiff’s claims of serious ongoing misconduct by the defendants.
Indeed, no explanation has ever been provided as to why the Attorney General did not represent plaintiff Anderson against any of the original defendants. This was itself a misappropriation of public funds by a state investigative agency with prosecution powers.”
“36. The court gave the jury above-referenced instructions and its members adjourned to the jury room to deliberate at approximately 1:25 pm on Thursday, October 29, 2009.
After the jury left the courtroom, the court first announced that she had denied the defendants’ pending motion for a directed verdict.
She next stated words to the effect that she found that , “….Cahill was aware of the whitewashing allegations…” (Exhibit A, pages 808-809) The judge read this statement related to defendant Cahill’s conduct into the record as part of her order denying defendant’s directed verdict.
This fact alone requires a new trial, and should have resulted in the Attorney General’s office immediately withdrawing from the case.”
38. The Court’s finding of culpability on the part of Defendant Cahill constitutes newly discovered evidence, which directly supports the fundamental allegations of Plaintiff.
Remand to the District Court for a new trial is highly likely as the trial court abused its discretion in denying a new trial. The Attorney General’s failure to withdraw is, in fact, sanctionable and worthy of referral to the attorney ethics committee.”
V. Witness Tampering – Threat on Witness in a Federal Proceeding
42. The Attorney General and the trial court were aware that in August of 2008, one of the plaintiff’s witnesses, DDC staff attorney Nicole Corrado, was threatened.
Two days prior to her deposition testimony, state employee, and DDC Deputy Chief Counsel, Andral N. Bratton, and who had been her immediate supervisor for approximately 5 years, confronted Corrado.”
“43. Following Corrado’s deposition testimony on August 21, 2008, Bratton’s behavior toward Corrado became more harassing, troubling, frightening and threatening as he began to follow her inside and outside of the state office where they both worked. Corrado subsequently reported these serious issues to DDC chief counsel Allan Friedberg, Deputy chief Counsel Sherry Cohen, a defendant in the current proceeding, and DDC Chief Investigator Vincent Raniere- all of whom who took no required action.”
Other Iviewit News
"Another One Bites the Dust! Defendant in Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Federal Lawsuit, Sherry K. Cohen of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee joins Thomas Cahill in early retirement.
Iviewit Inventor, Eliot I Bernstein Supports Criminal Actions Against Cohen, Cahill and other Members of the New York Supreme Court. EXTRA — READ ALL ABOUT IT @ EXPOSE CORRUPT COURTS!!!" @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=394
Source of Post
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-christine-anderson-ny-supreme-court-whistleblower-swinging-new-york-attorney-general-andrew-cuomo-claims-cuomo-violating-public-office-aiding-ab-1284724204.html
Thursday, February 3, 2011
What is Being Done About the Wall of Corruption in New York ? Christine C. Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Government Entities such as the Tenth Judicial Grievance Committee in New York are Part of the Problem and no where near a part of the Solution.
Christine Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Enough is Enough New York.
Expose Corrupt Law Firms and the Judges Who Protect them.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Christine Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Enough is Enough New York.
Expose Corrupt Law Firms and the Judges Who Protect them.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
New York Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District Leslie Anderson - Reading my Posts On Philip Falcone, Why?
Why is Leslie B. Anderson of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York researching my Blogs, Reading my Posts On Philip Falcone and Harbinger Philip Falcone ?
74-82-64-160.rdns.blackberry.net
| 19th November 2010 | 06:33:05 | Page View | No referring link www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/harbinger-capital-partners-philip.html |
| 19th November 2010 | 06:35:28 | Page View | No referring link www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/harbinger-capital-partners-philip_11.html |
| 22nd November 2010 | 14:15:38 | Page View | No referring link www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/leslie-b-anderson-second-department-new.html |
| 22nd November 2010 | 14:16:01 | Exit Link | http://www.blogger.com/profile/17987501178539348080 |
Seems to me that the Same THUGS at the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York that helped George Demos, Corrupt New York Attorney - Corrupt SEC Investigator covered over 330 Million in Fraud by JP Morgan and the the Same Lawless Bunch that Illegally Suspended the License of New York Attorney Ruth Pollack as well as helped countless Companies and Politicians to cover up Billions on top of Billions in Scandals...
Well they are Now Doing What they Can to Set Up - Discredit, Defame and Bring Economic Terrorism to Harbinger Capital Partner in order to Protect "Verizon" Stocks, on behalf of Companies such as and CERTAINLY not limited to... Goldman Sachs.. Blackstone and Very Important THUGS and Cronies such as the "Crotty" Family .. Right..?? I mean Connections to Verizon.. Gee that's not a hard connection to make.. More on that Fun Story Later..
So on the 19th of Nov. Leslie B. Anderson, (Cleaner - Whitewasher for Andrew Cuomo) 10th Judicial in New York is researching Harbinger Capital Partners to bone up on the scoop for her newest smack down in conjunction with the NYAG Corruption that is setting up Harbinger Capital Partners and Philip Falcone in order to Protect Verizon for Goldman Sachs and the Other Ga-Zillionaires invested in Verizon and Related Companies.
Which actually protects money that Paul A. Crotty, Former President of Verizon New
York has invested Right? or Stocks.. or ? ... Former Verizon President then a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, covering Manhattan - Hmmmm .. I Say - Paul A. Crotty has some Explaining to do.. Convenient Manhattan NYAG Investigating Harbinger Capital Partners and Philip Falcone.. ( Coming Soon - www.PaulCrotty.com - Got a Tip on Paul Crotty Corruption - Crystal@CrystalCox.com )
Anyway.. More on that Coming SOON ~ Count on It. For this post know that the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District is the "Cleaners" for the NYAG - Andrew Cuomo Corruption - ( Note: the Crotty Family put the Cuomo Family in Power - More on that Later) and all this is what protects Companies like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, and Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose .. as well as tech companies like Intel Corp. , IBM, and media companies like Time Warner Inc.
See Andrew Cuomo pulls the strings on puppets like Leslie B. Anderson and WaLa the TRUTH Teller is Discredited, Set Up and quite often fined and jailed.. OR even Worse.. anyway.. they are harassed so much that they just want their life back so they Go Away.. NOT ME. . I don't go Away and Leave Victims in the Trenches.. NOT My Way.. So .. I am here to STAY..
And Now the Corrupt New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is to Be the Governor of New York, so this Wall of Corruption gets Stronger..
Thing is One day soon the Truth about Andrew Cuomo, and the Attorney Fraternity out of New York will be blatantly obvious to all and that Tipping Point is just about to arrive .. iViewit Technology - Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger and Brave Whistleblowers Such as Ruth Pollack and Christine Anderson, along with many others EXPOSING YOU .. RIGHT now.. Well We See that this Tipping Point Comes a Knocking.. and Soon..
The Proof of Corruption in the New York Justice System is getting bigger and bigger, Whistleblowers like Ruth Pollack, Christine Anderson and more are exposing massive amounts of corruption along with tons of blogs - Andrew Cuomo can only hide his Dirty Deeds so long. ...
Which actually protects money that Paul A. Crotty, Former President of Verizon New
York has invested Right? or Stocks.. or ? ... Former Verizon President then a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, covering Manhattan - Hmmmm .. I Say - Paul A. Crotty has some Explaining to do.. Convenient Manhattan NYAG Investigating Harbinger Capital Partners and Philip Falcone.. ( Coming Soon - www.PaulCrotty.com - Got a Tip on Paul Crotty Corruption - Crystal@CrystalCox.com )
Anyway.. More on that Coming SOON ~ Count on It. For this post know that the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District is the "Cleaners" for the NYAG - Andrew Cuomo Corruption - ( Note: the Crotty Family put the Cuomo Family in Power - More on that Later) and all this is what protects Companies like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, and Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose .. as well as tech companies like Intel Corp. , IBM, and media companies like Time Warner Inc.
See Andrew Cuomo pulls the strings on puppets like Leslie B. Anderson and WaLa the TRUTH Teller is Discredited, Set Up and quite often fined and jailed.. OR even Worse.. anyway.. they are harassed so much that they just want their life back so they Go Away.. NOT ME. . I don't go Away and Leave Victims in the Trenches.. NOT My Way.. So .. I am here to STAY..
And Now the Corrupt New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is to Be the Governor of New York, so this Wall of Corruption gets Stronger..
Thing is One day soon the Truth about Andrew Cuomo, and the Attorney Fraternity out of New York will be blatantly obvious to all and that Tipping Point is just about to arrive .. iViewit Technology - Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger and Brave Whistleblowers Such as Ruth Pollack and Christine Anderson, along with many others EXPOSING YOU .. RIGHT now.. Well We See that this Tipping Point Comes a Knocking.. and Soon..
The Proof of Corruption in the New York Justice System is getting bigger and bigger, Whistleblowers like Ruth Pollack, Christine Anderson and more are exposing massive amounts of corruption along with tons of blogs - Andrew Cuomo can only hide his Dirty Deeds so long. ...
Ruth Pollack Testimony
Christine Anderson Testimony
That Tipping Point May Just Be the Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies Criminal Complaint against NYAG Andrew Cuomo - Governor Elect Andrew Cuomo. What the New York Governors Office Does with this Criminal Complaint against Andrew Cuomo will be under a Major Spotlight, I WILL MAKE SURE OF IT.
Here is the Criminal Complaint against NYAG Andrew Cuomo - Governor Elect Andrew Cuomo made by Eliot Bernstein, Founder of Iviewit Technologies and One of the Iviewit Inventors.
Here is the Criminal Complaint against NYAG Andrew Cuomo - Governor Elect Andrew Cuomo made by Eliot Bernstein, Founder of Iviewit Technologies and One of the Iviewit Inventors.
Or Maybe the Tipping Point on New York Corruption will be the Petition For Writ Of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court - Kevin G. Chesney - Chesney v. Valley Stream
See the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District gets down in the mud and takes peoples lives as they know it, takes their careers and reputation and all to cover up what Andrew Cuomo .. Says they MUST Cover Up. Which has no basis in Equal Protection under the Law, and No Relevance to the True Facts of the Cases involved.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York via Cronies .. Puppets like Leslie Anderson - well they have the power to SHUT down the Truth with the Stroke of a Pen and in the Judicial Hell Hole of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in the Court of New York - Well the TRUTH is NO Defense... and You Lose.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York via Cronies .. Puppets like Leslie Anderson - well they have the power to SHUT down the Truth with the Stroke of a Pen and in the Judicial Hell Hole of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in the Court of New York - Well the TRUTH is NO Defense... and You Lose.
So Today While Leslie B. Anderson is Researching the Latest Andrew Cuomo, Paul Crotty High Finance Victim - "Harbinger Capital Partners" - Well She stumbles on what I posted about her, last week, which was mostly just a bio with a bit of sass, and was nothing compared to what I had Already Exposed of her corrupt activity over the Peter Sivere incident and the Smackdown of New York Attorney Ruth Pollack.
None the Less.. the NYAG - Andrew Cuomo Thug for Hire - Leslie B. Anderson.. well she just noticed my writings today and well she got riled up like a Rabid Grizzly Bear and Boy did She Screw Up !!!
None the Less.. the NYAG - Andrew Cuomo Thug for Hire - Leslie B. Anderson.. well she just noticed my writings today and well she got riled up like a Rabid Grizzly Bear and Boy did She Screw Up !!!
Stepped Right into Blogger Scat She Did.. You Can See from the Web Stats above that Today Leslie Anderson looks at my Blog Post on her and then admires the Blogger Profile "Queen of all Database" - which is the fake profile she set up today to defame my real estate company, Slam me, Discredit me, Harass me and well PROVE that she can actually "investigate" something if she wants to .. even if it is just WHO Owns CrystalCox.com ~ Which is Kind of.. Well Easy..
So Who is Paying Leslie B. Anderson of the New York Court System to attack me, harass me, post defamation on me ... Well the New York Tax Payers ARE for One.. thing is which Puppet Master has Leslie B. Anderson ALL up in my business and why Today after months of Exposing her Corrupt activity .. why Come for me Today? What's so Special About Today?
This was her Comment. "in part" to not further defame the innocent, I will be giving the Full Document to my Attorney for my Defamation Lawsuit against the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in the New York Court System and Against Leslie B. Anderson Personally.
Leslie Anderson of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York Posted This On My Blog Today from WORK on YOUR DIME !! ( please note the mis-spellings and grammar as well as her slam in My First attack this morning which I will share in another Post, well that was about My Grammar.. and Spelling. ..
Leslie B. Anderson, NY 10th District Grievance Comm. Posts this:
"... I hope that you make a better real estate agent than you do "Investigatiave Blogger"
Your "information" pales when compared to that publically available on networks such as LinkedIn.com.
Your "information" pales when compared to that publically available on networks such as LinkedIn.com.
Less than two minutes of my own "investigative" work uncovered your identity:"
So Slams my Real Estate Career she Assumes I have .... Spells Investigative WRONG.. Slams my "network" and then .. WOW.. Such a GREAT Investigator for the the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York - She Uncovered MY SECRET.. Who I am.. the Burning Question on Everyone's Tongue.. Who is this Masked Investigative Blogger Calling herself Crystal L. Cox?
I do Post in my own name Pretty Much Every Day and well uncovering my "Identity" is certainly NOT something such a Powerful New York Attorney should brag about being able to do and so Quickly To.. "Snaps for Leslie B. Anderson" - Good Job ~ You Uncovered my Real Identity... Now What?
Anyway, Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York and Leslie B. Anderson Puppet for New York Corruption... The Victims in your Financial War, Your Greedy Corporate Cover Ups.. that Simply told the TRUTH on Corruption, and turned on a Light in a Room that had lots of bad deeds happening for a very long time - Well THEY will NOT be Collateral Damage on My Watch. I Will EXPOSE you Leslie B. Anderson .. Every SINGLE Act.. Every Law You Broker, Every Indescretion, Every Ethics Violation, If it Takes me a Decade to Do it.. - Can't ya Just Hear them there Skeletons Rattlin' in Leslie Anderson's Closet? Boy I sure Can.. Music to My Ears..
Stay Tuned.. It Should be "Riveting"...
And PS: I do have a Spine, I do have a Good Moral Compass, And I do stand on the Right Side of the Law...I Do not Let those Who Tell the TRUTH be stripped of all they know to be there life and Do Nothing to Get Their Truth Heard, and I DO post in My Real Name.. So Leslie B. Anderson - aKa - "Queen of all database" - You may Want to "Bring Your A Game" for your Next Attack on Me..
posted Proudly By
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Investigative Blogger
Tiny Little Sidenote.. "I don't Think you have the Stomach for This, "Pumpkin" - and I guarantee you, MY BALLS are bigger then YOURS.. "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)